Jeffrey Palermo (.com)

Sponsors

The Lounge

News

Advertisement

Images in this post missing? We recently lost them in a site migration. We're working to restore these as you read this. Should you need an image in an emergency, please contact us at imagehelp@codebetter.com
VB6 still works! Who would have thought? - level 000

There is a current VB6 process that I was considering rewriting in .Net with C#.  I began learning the code to prepare for the rewrite, and there is a LOT of code.  I realized as I dug deeper into the code that I would be better off making the code changes necessary in VB6 instead of doing a complete rewrite.  Now, I am not a veteran Visual Basic developer, so I prefer working in .Net with C#, but the more I thought about it the more I knew that keeping this process as VB6 would be better.  This code was several years old and had stood the test of time.  My rewrite would undoubtedly introduce bugs that don't exist now.

The point of this post is that we should not rewrite to .Net just for the sake of .Net.  We code every new process in .Net, but out legacy code still marches on.


Posted 11-08-2004 1:30 PM by Jeffrey Palermo

[Advertisement]

Comments

Eric Wise wrote RE: VB6 still works! Who would have thought? - level 000
on 11-08-2004 12:30 PM
I was actually advised from the VB Team members on the VB Road Show that anything in VB6 com objects should not be rewritten just for the sake of a rewrite.

If the MS team says to leave it alone, I'll leave it alone.