CodeBetter.Com
CodeBetter.Com
RSS 2.0 via Feedburner
           Do you Twitter? Follow us @CodeBetter

Jeffrey Palermo (.com)

Blog moved to www.jeffreypalermo.com

Sam Gentile packed the house at ADNUG and preached the good news of Extreme Programming - level 200

Sam has already posted about it here, but I'll continue.

Yesterday's Austin .Net User Group meeting was a big success.  We had 80 people, our largest crowd in a long time.  Miguel Castro was pretty close with 75, but for the past several months we've had over 5 first-time guests, so people are spreading the word about the group.  I try to keep the group focused on software concepts that are core to building sustainable software that can add value to the business now and for years to come.  If you believe in "voting with your feet", then these topics are getting a lot of votes. 

Sam answered a question about what skills were needed in a developer, and he made a great point:  A good software developer is one who can create software that's easy to change.  Not someone who's an expert in SQL server, Indigo, ASP.NET, etc because those technologies will be the next legacy systems.  A good developer hops from technology to technology but always keeps the software easy to change - after all, that's the only constant.

We normally go until 7:30pm, but yesterday we went to 8:05 (Sam could have talked until midnight, but I had to cut him off), and 75% of the folks stayed to the very end (60 out of 80).  It was obvious that everyone was very interested in what was being said.

We went to Rudy's BBQ afterward and continued the discourse.  12 folks stayed until 10:30pm talking about TDD, iterations, FIT, estimating, how to handle a developer that's not pulling his weight, etc.  Great talk!

Sam was amazed that it was 80 degrees in the middle of the day and 70 degrees late at night.  He's used to it being bitterly cold.  For us, that's just what it's like in Texas - of course we deal with 100+ in the summer also, and it only snows once a decade.


Comments

Jeffrey Palermo said:

Sam did not discuss mock objects in his talk.
I do think NMock (or some mock framework) is a necessary tool for unit testing, but it's possible to using only concrete mocks, fakes, and stubs if you prefer.  I prefer mock objects for interaction-based testing.

UI unit testing might be an oxymoron if you mean GUI testing.  There are UI recorders that could be used, though.  Testing the UI will have some sort of integration, I think.

TDD uses unit tests to drive the creation of code.  If code can be unit tested, then it can be test-driven.  I don't know of a way to unit test GUI code.
# April 18, 2006 10:49 PM

About Jeffrey Palermo

Jeffrey Palermo is a software management consultant and the CTO of Headspring Systems in Austin, TX. Jeffrey specializes in Agile coaching and helps companies double the productivity of software teams. Jeffrey is an MCSD.Net , Microsoft MVP, Certified Scrummaster, Austin .Net User Group leader, AgileAustin board member, INETA speaker, INETA Membership Mentor, Christian, husband, father, motorcyclist, Eagle Scout, U.S. Army Veteran, and Texas A&M University graduate. Check out Devlicio.us!

This Blog

Syndication

News

Headspring Systems

View Jeffrey Palermo's profile on LinkedIn

See my new blog at .jeffreypalermo.com