CodeBetter.Com
CodeBetter.Com
RSS 2.0 via Feedburner
           Do you Twitter? Follow us @CodeBetter

Raymond Lewallen

Framework Design, Agile Coach, President Oklahoma City Developers Group, Microsoft MVP C#, TDD, Continuous Integration, Patterns and Practices, Domain Driven Design, Speaker, VB.Net, C# and Sql Server

Wouldn't you like to respond to your user's issues and bug reports like this?

Sometimes you get some really funny issues reported to you from users of your website or application.  And every once in awhile, you’d just LOVE to give them back some smart-ass solutions and remarks regarding those comments.  Well, that is exactly what some ground crew and mechanics did with some of their “bug” reports.  Working in the aircraft and pilot industry, this is super funny to me, and I hope you enjoy it to.

After every flight, Qantas pilots fill out a form, called a "gripe sheet," which tells mechanics about problems with the aircraft.  The mechanics correct the problems, document their repairs on the form, and then pilots review the gripe sheets before the next flight.  Never let it be said that ground crews lack a sense of humor.
 
By the way, Qantas is the only major airline that has never had an accident.

Problem: Left inside main tire almost needs replacement.
Solution: Almost replaced left inside main tire.

Problem: Test flight OK, except auto-land very rough.
Solution: Auto-land not installed on this aircraft.
 
Problem: Something loose in cockpit.
Solution: Something tightened in cockpit.

Problem: Dead bugs on windshield.
Solution: Live bugs on back-order.

Problem: Autopilot in altitude-hold mode produces a 200 feet per minute descent.
Solution: Cannot reproduce problem on ground.

Problem: Evidence of leak on right main landing gear.
Solution: Evidence removed.

Problem: DME volume unbelievably loud.
Solution: DME volume set to more believable level.

Problem: Friction locks cause throttle levers to stick.
Solution: That's what they're for.

Problem: IFF inoperative.
Solution: IFF always inoperative in OFF mode.

Problem: Suspected crack in windshield.
Solution: Suspect you're right.

Problem: Number 3 engine missing.
Solution: Engine found on right wing after brief search.

Problem: Aircraft handles funny.
Solution: Aircraft warned to straighten up, fly right, and be serious.

Problem: Target radar hums.
Solution: Reprogrammed target radar with lyrics.

Problem: Mouse in cockpit.
Solution: Cat installed.

And the best one for last..................

Problem: Noise coming from under instrument panel. Sounds like a midget pounding on something with a hammer.
Solution: Took hammer away from midget.



Comments

breichelt said:

The only reason I knew about Qantas not having an accident was from "Rain Man" :) Very funny list, I like the one about the volume
# December 14, 2005 11:40 AM

Tom said:

Good to see Quantas have installed Identify Friend or Foe systems and targeting radar. No wonder they never have accidents!!!! ;-)
# December 14, 2005 1:13 PM

optionsScalper said:

Hilarious. My brother is a pilot so I'll send him this link.

---O
# December 14, 2005 6:09 PM

John Papa said:

This is awesome. I was laughing out loud!
# December 14, 2005 10:52 PM

Jon Choy said:

That sounds more like the supposed US Naval Aviation carrier gripe sheet than one for Qantas. I don't know of any civilian airlines operating aircraft with IFF and targetting radar...

Military ground crews will laugh harder than the pilots...
# December 28, 2005 10:07 AM

ScottBellware said:

# December 28, 2005 9:03 PM

Raymond Lewallen said:

Ah. They had a good run.
# December 28, 2005 10:34 PM

Raymond Lewallen said:

Jon,

All U.S. civilian passenger jets have IFF. FAA regulations require that all aircraft, military or civilian, flying at an altitude of 10,000 feet or higher in U.S. controlled airspace, must be equipped with an operating IFF transponder system capable of automatic altitude reporting (this is the reason that two of the modes are used by both military and civilian aircraft). True, Quantas is not a U.S. air carrier, but if they fly to the U.S., then they are required to have IFF.

The targeting radar doesn't necessarily mean a target radar for weapons. Navigatin radars and secondary radars *can* be referred to as target radars, even though it is more commonly associated with weaponry and military aircraft.
# December 29, 2005 9:57 AM

Leave a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  

Enter the numbers above:
Add

About Raymond Lewallen

Working primarily in the public sector during his career, Raymond has designed and built several high profile enterprise level applications for all levels of the government. Raymond now works as a solutions architect for EMC. Raymond is an agile coach, Microsoft MVP C# and also president of the Oklahoma City Developers Group and Oklahoma Agile Developers Group. Raymond spends a lot of his time learning and teaching such things as Test Driven Development, Domain Driven Design, Design Patterns and Extreme Programming practices and principles, to name a few. Raymond is also an advocate of Alt.Net. Raymond is primarily a framework guy, so don't ask him anything about UI :) Check out Devlicio.us!