Which do you use?
What do you feel are the pros and cons of that particular system against its competition.
-
Archives
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- October 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
I use Umbraco (www.umbraco.org). It’s a .NET open source project. It’s flexible, standards based (XML, XSLT) and has a huge and active community. Highly recommended!
Greg: yeah, but Ektron is EIGHT GRAND for their CMS. And it limits you to 1 domain and 10 users. Granted, you specified an enterprise type installation….
I have looked at Sitebuilder (buggy UI) and DotNetNuke. I currently use DNN for some projects and it works out great. I love CommunityServer, but I don’t think it really falls under the CMS moniker.
You might also look here for a good comparitive matrix:
http://www.cmsmatrix.org/
I will add in that I have used Ektron’s CMS. It has some amazing features for an “enterprise” type installation such as the ability to setup workflows for human translation services.
I use a CMS that a friend of mine built called nCms. It’s a .Net/C# based CMS that is modular with a simple, masterpages based template system.
Cons: It is tied to IIS/SQL Server setup. The good news is he is porting it to Rails.
Thanks for asking. http://vinetype.com Vine Type is the CMS I designed and use.
Pros: Small. Needs no database, serves up valid XHTML 1.1 even running under .NET 1.1 Framework, Installs in under three minutes, supports multiple templates, unlimited sections, subsections and cross-references.
Cons: No file management interface (users must ftp files to server by hand) No image gallery.
Unique Feature: Integrated image replacement allows users to display article titles in any font they want by simply placing a TrueType font file on the server and setting a configuration file entry.