MvcContrib now offers four (4) alternative view engines for ASP.NET MVC

That’s right.  If you prefer not to use the default ASPX view engine that comes with the ASP.NET MVC Framework, you now have options.  Here’s the rundown: (and keep tabs on my feed for more things MvcContrib: http://feeds.feedburner.com/jeffreypalermo)

The key here is options, and MvcContrib provides it.  I have to give credit to all the folks who have put time and energy into this project. 

The goal of this project is to be the community offering for extras for the ASP.NET MVC Framework.  If you are working on something that might be useful to someone else, consider contributing.  Check out the project at mvccontrib.org.  All good, documented, 95% unit test covered code with samples is welcome.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post.

5 Responses to MvcContrib now offers four (4) alternative view engines for ASP.NET MVC

  1. Eric says:

    It’s nice to have a few alternatives…

  2. Tuna Toksoz says:

    I wish we had django view engine, too. It is too complex for me to write.

  3. Kevin says:

    This is great news! Really happy about this :)

  4. @Atilla Ozgur:

    The Boo DLLs can be found at http://mvccontrib.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/bin/boo/
    This is a custom, patched version of Boo that contains support for extension methods (built from the latest trunk).

    I’ll update the MvcContrib wiki to make this clear.

    Jeremy

  5. Atilla Ozgur says:

    It seems that Brail sample does not work. According to this page.
    http://www.codeplex.com/MVCContrib/Wiki/View.aspx?title=Brail&referringTitle=Documentation
    Brail extensions needs this dll.
    Boo.Lang.Extensions.dll

    I could not find this dll in
    MVCContrib.release,Castle 1.0 RC3 ,SharpDevelop or Boo download itself

    Could you tell me where I can find this dll.

Leave a Reply