-
Archives
- May 2013
- February 2013
- October 2012
- August 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- March 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
Monthly Archives: July 2008
The Anonymous Namespace Bug
Actively participating in the development of a static code analyzer such as NDepend is a good way to learn about tricky Common Type System (CTS) details. Every feature have to be tested properly to cop with things like managed … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
2 Comments
Dealing with Code Un-Coverable by Tests
Code UnCoverable by Tests Even for test-coverage addict (as me), there is some code that simply cannot be covered by tests. An example? The call to MessageBox.Show() cannot be tested automatically since it is blocking. Of course we could mock calls to MessageBox.Show(), … Continue reading
Posted in Code Coverage, Code metrics, CQL, CQLinq, LoC, Maintainability, measurement
7 Comments
Rules for CLR Add-Ins Contract and View Assemblies
The CLR Add-In team recently released on CodePlex a set of 49 FxCop rules to verify View and Contract assemblies. If you don’t don’t know what is View and Contract assemblies, I suggest reading this excellent CLR Inside-Out MSDN … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Are you sure added and refactored code is covered by tests?
I would like to make a point here on the fact that NDepend can answer what is maybe the most important question for an agile programmer: Does added and refactored code is covered by tests? There are 4 CQL default … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
8 Comments
An Amazing Introduction to NDepend
Andre Loker just published an amazing introduction to NDepend on its blog. Most of features are introduced with some methodology reminder about why it is useful. Very nice job! Such introduction is welcomed. Indeed, something difficult in promoting a tool … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Some RichTextBox tricks
I have recently been responsible for refactoring the Code Query Language query editor in NDepend to fix some imperfections. The CQL query editor implementation is based on a class derived from the System.Windows.Controls.RichTextBox class. It was the … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
7 Comments